Panic Attack And Cruises

Handbook K twiteros Chavez

Twelve tips and some tips to make the discussions in Twitter:

1. Associate the opponent to Clarin, the concentrated power, the country contractor, or any other entity which represents the axis of evil.
2. If you disagree with the idea expressed, always acknowledge the author to charge for what you think. If in addition the idea is good, insist that insurance comes from a think tank hidden.
3. case of criticism of the government, say just that before were worse.
4. If what you say is very strong, acúselo simplistic.
5. If twitterers to disqualify provides concrete examples to save time, ask for them to reveal the sources.
6. If they are good, tell that this justice.
7. If introduced, a complainant compulsive acúselo following in the footsteps of Monner Sans and prosecute everything.
8. If you still resist, remind one sin of youth who commit. Only the officer is entitled to change their ideas.
9. If you can not weaken the argument, try something like a repeating him angry parrot, insulting their beliefs, remembering some personal defect. Any meanness that makes the opponent is out of his mind.
10. If you have to resort to direct insult, do it smart, without resorting to foul language. You can accuse him of basic, uninformed, service repressor.
11. not forget to watch: as soon as the opponent is removed, quickly contestéstele "skid."
12. should immediately tweeted the drift of the opponent with the remark "do not know debate."

Some concepts that should be included in the tweet to make it irrefutable:

• To appear sanctimonious not forget to include concepts such as concentrated industries, monopolies, 90, neo-fascism, appropriators, Birth & pop.
• If dare talk about corruption in this government, remind them that it is "management capability."
• If they mention matters on which there is no justification, remind other otherwise: For example, if you talk of mining pollution, remind that you should talk to glyphosate.
• If they talk about inflation or poverty, remind them that everything was worse in 2001.
• If the idea does not support rebuttal, remind them that could be serving destituyentes opponents (no matter what, if any).
• If the arguer uses phrases such as corruption, inefficiency, lack of planning, he says this is America, not Switzerland.

Partner: doubtful if a situation you do not get to talk to a supervisor or member of the "Project", stick the instructions above. In case of further breaking down the arguments and no argument can not win, get a new tweet name, wear the helmet of Eternauta, start again and Retweet to passage of winners.